Small, low budget films often have their work cut for themselves. Without a big budget or big name stars, they have to rely on smart writing, intriguing plots, and interesting, well-developed characters. Additionally, a tendency toward a weird, off beat story often helps make the film stand out from the crowd. Sometimes, though, such films go too far and come off as bizarre or just downright irritating. "Kicked in the Head," the latest small film trying to be the next "hip" feature, fails at the first part (the smart writing, etc...) and excels at the latter (the irritating quality), resulting in a horrible mess that's excruciating to sit through. It starts out okay with characters that show a little potential for being different and with what appears to be somewhat of an interesting plot. Yet it quickly falls prey to its obvious attempts at being cute and different. Many scenes are long, boring, and don't move the story forward as they try to exhibit "Tarantino-like" (as in Quentin of "Pulp Fiction") dialogue, but fail miserably.
Talented cast members like Woods and Fiorentino are completely wasted and Corrigan's performance is flat, listless, and fails to evoke any sympathy -- or for that matter, interest -- from the audience. The plot eventually boils down to Redmond's "wild adventures" as he mindlessly bops from one scene to another, but they, and the movie in general, are terribly constructed, boring, and a tremendous waste of everyone's time. A fellow critic at our press screening uttered a loud exclamation when the credits finally began to roll, and his obvious disbelief and irritation about what he had just witnessed was quickly agreed upon by everyone else. There's little reason to go on about this film, and so I'll end with an answer to the question concerning the film's title. "Kicked in the Head" refers to how you'll feel after seeing this film if you're foolish enough to sit all the way through it. You've been warned. This film gets a marginal 1 out of 10.