Released in 1995, the original "Babe" was a surprise hit among critics and viewers. Grossing around $66 million domestically and recipient of seven Oscar nominations (including Best Picture, but winner of only one -- Best Visual Effects), the film was cute and charming. While I found the critical and Academy reaction to it a bit overrated, it was a fun little picture that included a few menacing moments -- as do many movies aimed at kids -- to keep things interesting.
Now, however, and following the "sequel should be darker" path that director Tim Burton took with the "Batman" series, writer/director George Miller has given a similar treatment to the porker sequel, "Babe: Pig in the City." While the Caped Crusader could survive such a dark and gloomy surrounding, it seems a very odd approach and decidedly huge misstep to take with a kids movie about a talking pig.
Reportedly, Universal had to do some last minute editing to this release after receiving negative responses to test screenings, as well as to get the film down to a G rating. Whatever they did, however, was not enough. While it would be interesting to see what they cut out, they certainly left a great deal of gloomy and foreboding material that should all but doom this film to critical and financial failure, especially considering its extremely sky-high budget.
While the original was directed by Chris Noonan, the sequel has fallen into the hands of Australian director George Miller, a talented filmmaker responsible for films such as "The Witches of Eastwick" and the "Mad Max" (Mel Gibson) pictures, who also cowrote the original "Babe" film.
As demonstrated by those other films, however, Miller has a knack for adding bits (or big chunks) of comically menacing material, and while that's perfectly fine for pictures aimed at adults, it doesn't mix well with material aimed at young kids who won't get the intended irony and/or dark humor.
According to the film's press kit Miller states: "You can't soft pedal, especially with kids. They too, live in a world where with every bit of joy, there's sadness, with every life, there's death. You must deal with both sides or the piece is not whole." While that may be somewhat true, many parents may favor the happier and sunnier surroundings of the original for their kids, especially the young ones who will definitely be attracted to this picture.
To be fair, the film has its share of fun and lively moments, returns most of the familiar characters from the first (including the cute, singing mice trio) and does end on a sunny and uplifting note as everything turns out okay by the story's end. In addition, the kids will most likely be highly entertained by the animal characters, their vocalization, and the shenanigans in which they're involved.
As such, the collective work of animal trainers/supervisors Steve Martin and Karl Miller (for wrangling literally hundreds of animals throughout the film) and Neal Scanlan (animal animatronics) and animal visual effects supervisor, Bill Westenhofer, should all get kudos for their tremendous effort in making the animals seem realistically human in their vocal delivery and behavior.
While Babe (voiced by E.G. Daily instead of the original's Christine Cavanuagh without any noticeable change) obviously returns and is the central character, the scene stealers are the three chimps, a capuchin, and an orangutan dressed and acting like an old fuddy-duddy butler.
Since primates more closely resemble humans than any of the other animals -- especially in their extremely expressive eyes -- and the special effects used to generate their mouth movement are so realistic with each vocalization so suited for the respective characters, you'll soon forget that they can't really talk. Since the effect works so well, it's my guess that we'll soon see TV's favorite chimp, Lancelot Link, heading to the big screen for some more monkeying around.
The rest of the animal characters and their respective voices are also fine, with Stanley Ralph Ross doing a fine and funny "wiseguy" take on his pit bull character. The human characters are okay -- despite their supporting character status -- although fans of the original film may be disappointed that James Cromwell -- Farmer Hoggett -- doesn't occupy much screen time in his role that merely bookends the main proceedings.
The story, by Miller and scribes Judy Morris and Mark Lamprell, is competent enough, although Babe's goal to save the farm from foreclosure pretty much evaporates midway through the story (with a deus ex machina -- a last minute element -- thrown in to resolve the farm's financial woes). The film's narration by "earthy" voiced Roscoe Lee Browne, perfectly suits the picture's fairytale feel.
While the film has its moments, it's clearly too dark for children's entertainment, no matter what Miller believes to be true. Although the characters and vocalizations are cute and well-done, the fact that we've already seen this before also lessens that initial "fun" feeling the first film so effortlessly exuded.
Decent, but clearly not as good as its predecessor, we found the conflict of the film's lighthearted fun and its dark and menacing danger too incongruous for its own good. As such, "Babe: Pig in the City" gets just a 4 out of 10.