Literally interpreting the translation of Los Angeles, "City Of Angels" is one of those films that you'll either love or hate -- and a great deal of that might just depend on what kind of hormones you've got running through your body. Not to sexually stereotype moviegoers, but it's pretty much a standard fact that women like love stories while men prefer action flicks. Of course, not everyone falls into those distinctions, and many of both genders like both types of films. For the most part, though, women have a thing for love stories -- especially ones where the man changes for the woman -- and ladies, you're probably going to love this one.
You may even be able to get the man in your life to accompany you to the theater if you mention that one of today's big action stars -- Nicolas Cage ("The Rock," "Con Air," and "Face/Off") -- is one of the lead actors. Perhaps you shouldn't mention, however, that he was also in "Moonstruck" or "Peggy Sue Got Married," for those films are more in tune with what happens in this picture. Giving his testosterone-laced career a rest, Cage returns to the romantic drama and excels in his performance as the love lorn angel who will do anything to be with his dream woman, played by Meg Ryan.
Essentially a remake of Wim Wenders' 1988 film, "Wings of Desire," this picture pretty much follows the same plot. A pair of angels, capable of "hearing" human thoughts and always present to console the nervous and the dying, wonder what it's really like to be human. After one of the falls in love with a human, he decides to hang up his nonexistent wings so to speak, and become one of the fragile, emotionally complex, and definitely mortal beings he's observed but never really known.
These aren't your white-robed, sit on a cloud with a harp while sunning your wings types of angels, though. They're more your ordinary Joe's and Jane's, all rather solemn and wearing long, dark overcoats. They've traded in those clouds for sitting on top of billboards, buildings, and yes, even the famous Hollywood sign. Shot by Academy Award winning cinematographer John Seale ("The English Patient") the images are wonderfully presented as we see angels everywhere throughout L.A. Accompanied by fellow Oscar winner Gabriel Yared's (also from "The English Patient") haunting and often touching score, the overall results are quite impressive, especially early in the film as we see the angels comforting various people in distress.
Filmed in something akin to "fantasy-vision" (if there were such a thing), the filmmakers also have to be commended for making Los Angeles look like an angelic city. Despite all of the glamour and glitz, smog and crime, and massive urban sprawl, this film shows that love can sprout there and transcend any boundaries that may be in the way.
Many impressive moments abound, such as when Maggie -- despondent over the feelings of death lingering all about her -- goes and sits in a hospital nursery to be surrounded by new life and, more importantly, the concept of hope for the future. The scene is nicely underplayed, as is most of the rest of the movie, all of which gives the film anything but the standard "Hollywood" feel.
Instead of presenting Heaven and angels in a nuts and bolts fashion -- such as seen in the brilliant "Defending Your Life" -- the film's focus is on mood and emotion. We never really know much about the rules and regulations pertaining to Seth, but this near constant dreamlike state soothes the audience to the point where we don't want or need to be asking those pesky "but what about" questions.
That fantasy approach also gives director Brad Silberling ("Casper") and screenwriter Dana Stevens ("Blink") the ability to allow certain elements to pass by without the standard critical scrutiny. For instance, when Seth first experiences the human senses, one would imagine he'd be overwhelmed and nearly drowned from sensory overload -- something akin to a horrible panic attack or nervous breakdown. While he has a few reactions (mainly joy at finally experiencing what he's observed for eons), Silberling and Stevens have opted not to take the obvious comedic route (although the possibilities there are immense). Likewise, they allow Maggie to fall under Seth's "spell" that prevents her -- and ultimately the audience -- from wondering why she isn't more curious about this mysterious man who's suddenly appeared in her life.
Of course it doesn't hurt that ol' Saint Nick (no, a different one) inhabits that character. As aptly demonstrated in his previous films, Academy Award winner Nicolas Cage (for "Leaving Las Vegas") has an incredibly expressive and soulful face. That rare gift -- that most performers would die for -- allows him to easily, and more importantly, to believably express his emotions with a "simple" look. One feels the comfort his character exudes, and the moments where he consoles the troubled, the sick, and/or the recently deceased are truly touching and heartfelt. It's a nice contrast to, and break from, the characters he's played in his recent pictures.
Meg Ryan ("When Harry Met Sally," "Sleepless In Seattle") also delivers a great performance portraying the surgeon whose life is run by her head and not her heart (while symbolically she operates on others' hearts to make them better). Yet when she loses a patient despite her mighty efforts, one feels her emotional pain. While some may question Ryan in this role (based on the previously charming or "wacky" characters she's inhabited in other films), one only has to remember her work in "Courage Under Fire" where she clearly demonstrated her ability to play serious and complicated characters.
Supporting performances are also outstanding. Dennis Franz ("Die Hard 2," TV's "N.Y.P.D. Blue") plays a heart patient with a special understanding of Seth's plight, and delivers a compassionate and welcome change from the gruff, edgy characters he so often plays (although we do get the "treat" of seeing his bare butt once again). Just as good is Andre Braugher's take as Seth's angelic partner. I've always enjoyed his work (his fabulous role in "Glory" and his continued work on TV's "Homicide") and the only downside to his calming performance is that he's underused. Of course if that's the worst criticism one can generate, then it'd be safe to say he's doing quite well.
Most women will undoubtably love this touching, wonderful film. Conversely, many men will probably say that they didn't like it, although deep down somewhere inside them it will have had some effect. Featuring great performances, aptly handled technical merits and a decidedly non- Hollywood feel, "City Of Angels" is definitely worth seeing. We give it an 8 out of 10.