You'd never guess how significant one commonly used word can be, but the omission of the word "a" from the title of the new film, "Passion in the Desert," completely changes its meaning. Based on the early 19th century novella, "A Passion in the Desert" by Honore de Balzac (who also penned the recently released "Cousin Bette"), this film is the equivalent of seeing a mirage after suffering and wandering through the desert like the lead character -- you won't believe what shows up before your eyes.
While the new title and the story's locale makes one think of films like "The English Patient" -- and it's gorgeously shot like that film -- it's more like "Beyond the Closed Jungle Doors with Tarzan." Not only will the romantics out there be disappointed -- unless they're into bestiality which we'll touch on in a moment -- but parents taking their kids in hopes of an old fashioned, Disney-like animal escapade will be shocked at what's presented (although the material may go over the younger kids' heads).
A compelling, if ultimately misguided directorial debut from Lavinia Currier (who cowrote the script with Martin Edmunds), the film starts off promisingly enough. After discovering a near dead, sunburnt, and injured man in the desert (a la "The English Patient") our curiosity is peaked as we backtrack through time to discover what led up to this moment. That's fine, many movies start that way, and the mystery instantly intrigues us, as does the wonderful scenery (shot in the Jordan desert and Utah as stand-ins for Egypt) so beautifully captured by cinematographer Alexei Rodionov ("Orlando").
After some brief moments with the Napoleonic army and a fierce battle, our hero and his charge find themselves wandering through the desert. Here the film -- while still visually stunning -- starts to sputter as Currier delivers standard-issue "lost in the desert" material that we've seen in countless other films.
Yet, we're still hanging on for the ride, still mildly curious about the protagonist when the main plot kicks in and the absurdity meter pegs off the scale and gets worse as the story progresses. For it's here that Augustin meets Simoom, the deadly leopardess that mysteriously doesn't attack and eat him like she does every other human. Not only are those laws of nature shattered, but our protagonist and the frisky feline soon share the same bloody carcasses, frolic in the caves and get down to some serious -- and near erotic -- tongue grooming of each other (think of the hairballs).
Yes, you read that right -- erotic. It gets even more preposterous when Augustin gets jealous of Simoom fooling around with a male leopard. Then -- in the currently fashionable male full nudity scene -- he slinks around on all fours while marking himself like a leopard, presumably to be more attractive to his new love. Hell hath no fury like a human scorned by a leopardess for another leopard.
If you haven't fallen away from the computer laughing hysterically by now, you must think I'm joking -- but alas, I'm not. Not being familiar with the original source novella, the only thing I could figure/hope was that all of this was supposed to be a dehydrated, desert induced hallucination. While there's the ever so brief possibility that such an explanation is the case, the rest of the "evidence" suggests that the filmmakers are playing this straight and don't realize just how absurd all of this actually comes off.
Sure, there will be some "serious" filmgoers out there who will see all sorts of symbolism in the picture. That's easy to do since this movie features the least amount of dialogue of any feature length production that I've seen in years or can quickly think of (beyond "Silent Movie"), and there's that old saying about a thousand words per picture. Some will obviously see this as representing the intrusion of man in the natural order of the animal kingdom, etc..., and while that's somewhat valid, the film's goofy bestiality element shortchanges any such notions.
As the main and essentially only human character to appear throughout the film, Ben Daniels does the best with the material he's been given. With his long, blond mane of hair, and slender catlike physique, he easily adopts the feline disposition and appearance, and is game to coming mighty close to making a grand fool of himself. If anything, however, he should get the award for most courageous actor of the year as he performed "without a net" with three hand-raised, but still wild and unpredictable leopards that played Simoom.
Currier, who had those leopards specially raised for their part in this film, obviously adores the big cats and lovingly films them with as much majesty as their barren surroundings. As such, the film works on a visual level, and has to since, as stated earlier, there's not much dialogue to rely upon.
Without the wholehearted belief that all of this is a desert mirage, however, all of the wonderful scenery and camera work (that can otherwise be found on the Discovery Channel or similarly based National Geographic specials) can't make up for the unrealistic and quite absurd material that intrudes upon what could have been a good film.
Never learning why this leopard grants Augustin immunity to the deadly laws of nature, and not even wanting to explore the multilayered sub-text of bestiality that suddenly pops up near the end of the movie (other than making one question Tarzan's behavior in all of those movies before Jane showed up), I'm disappointed that the film ultimately comes off as a letdown. That's especially true when it feels that there's an epic story hidden somewhere under the surface just wanting to get out.
Currier shows some potential, but can't survive the material that will unintentionally cause some of the biggest laughs and/or awkwardly embarrassing moments of the week in the cinema. With a bare bones plot, no character development (other than turning into an animal) and little appeal (once the erotic truth is known) outside the art house circuit, this film will disappear faster than a drop of water hitting the hot desert sands. We give "Passion in the Desert" a 3 out of 10.