Appropriately titled for the action that fans of the series will take should more duds like this one be released, "Star Trek: Insurrection" is a listless, unimaginative sci-fi flick. This, the ninth big screen installment of the venerable TV show (counting the first six and a half featuring Bill Shatner and company), should only further strengthen the odd/even belief held by die-hard fans of the series (that the odd numbered theatrical installments are generally bad while the even numbered ones are good).
While "Insurrection" isn't as sterile as the big budget "Star Trek: The Motion Picture (#1) and clearly isn't as awful as "Star Trek: The Final Frontier (#5), it's certainly not as good as the earlier efforts in the series, "Wrath of Khan" (#2) and "The Voyage Home" (#4).
Playing out like a weak installment from either the original TV show or its "Next Generation" successor -- where the writers had brain lock for the week and couldn't come up with anything decent -- this picture is boring and trite and shows very little of the imaginative sci-fi elements for which the series is often revered.
Working from the ages old fountain of youth plot, the film contains many long and dull scenes featuring the Ba'Ku, a small group of peaceful, but (more importantly) non-aging technophobes who are so advanced that they no longer need nor want technology.
No, they don't use telekinetic powers to get things done. Instead, they spend their time happily farming and milling and playing some form of hacky sack (that apparently hasn't advanced much over the intervening centuries since it was invented).
As you can tell, that sounds like pretty exciting stuff, but wait, there are also some bad guys who want to relocate these people (no, not kill or harm, just relocate) so that they can collect the fountain of youth properties for themselves. And Captain Picard -- the decent humanitarian that he is -- just doesn't think that's right. Well, it doesn't take a rocket scientist -- or a Trek fan -- to realize that all of that's pretty boring stuff, and guess what? It is.
Sure, there are some inside jokes for those fans -- a few of which elicited some laughs from our audience -- but using exaggerated pimple gags and comments for humor can only be considering as mining the bottom of the comedy barrel.
The performances are all standard issue for the series -- meaning they're decent, but not outstanding -- but "guest" villain F. Murray Abraham ("Amadeus") can't do much with his character who's as thinly developed as the skin he constantly has stretched across his face.
On the other hand, Patrick Stewart, as our trustworthy captain, gets to show off his theatrical tonsils in a goofy bit featuring him singing a tune from Gilbert and Sullivan's "H.M.S. Pinafore." That and other similar moments are apparently intended to further the series' attempts at lightening up his previously stuffy character.
The special effects -- for what little screen time they get -- are okay, but appear too computer generated to be considered outstanding. Otherwise, the village setting of the Ba'Ku has that inexpensive, movie-set look often seen in similarly staged, peaceful futuristic settings.
Not the worst of the big screen series, but not even close to being on par with the best, it nearly seems as if the filmmakers -- director Jonathan Frakes (who also appears in the films as Commander Riker and who directed the last big screen installment) and Michael Piller (making his big screen writing debut after working on TV) -- simply decided not to try very hard to make a good picture (knowing this was an odd numbered installment).
Not surprisingly, it shows and while die-hard fans may find bits and pieces to enjoy (and will be pleased simply by getting to see their favorite characters back on the big screen once again), the film will do nothing to lure in, or please the average moviegoer. We give "Star Trek: Insurrection" a 3 out of 10.