If you're going to set out to tell a children's story, you certainly can't go wrong with the old "a boy and his dog" plot. A time-tested narrative, such tales have entertained kids for generations through books, TV shows and films such as "Old Yeller," the many incarnations of "Lassie" and even the "Air Bud" films.
Another such story is "A Dog of Flanders." Originally written in 1872 by English/Italian writer Maria Louise de la Ramée, the story has seen been translated into other languages and filmed several times for the big screen, most recently in 1959 (where Nello was played by young David Ladd, who later went on to marry Cheryl Ladd who appears in this film).
Now forty years later, the fifth such version of this story hits theaters and the results are a mixed bag. While I'm not familiar with the original story or any of its latter versions -- whether written or filmed -- evidently writer/director Kevin Brodie ("Delta Pi," "Treacherous") and cowriter Robert Singer (a TV director/producer) have taken some artistic liberties with the story. Some character changes have been made and the original, but apparently not-so-happy ending has been modified to make the picture a bit more kid friendly.
While literary purists may balk at such modifications, the true litmus test for the film is how well it plays to its target audience and their parents who may be hoping finally to have a decent family film at their disposal.
With the recent drought of good live-action films for kids -- notwithstanding the terrific "Fly Away Home" -- it's nice to see a film that employs neither the "Home Alone" precocious kid and related slapstick elements, nor the idiotic nature of films such as "Dudley Do-Right." That said, the question that remains is whether kids weaned on such material will want to see or be entertained by a period piece about a decent and thoughtful kid. While one would hope the answer to be an emphatic "yes," they may find many moments of it to be rather boring. It's also obvious the film will probably find more of an audience once it's out of the theaters and on video.
Although the film has a lush look with its great production values, features some decent performances and generally has a solid, if somewhat episodic plot, all of those combined elements are undermined by the filmmakers' approach at telling the story. Despite a few moments standing out as memorable, they never add up to create an all-encompassing, cohesive feel.
While the first two-thirds of the film unfold in a decent, if clearly not spectacular fashion, the last part of the film completely unravels. With a series of linearly connected but fractured scenes appearing, all coated with a heavy dose of thick and syrupy, and quite clearly mawkish qualities, the ending may moisten the eyes of those who weep over sentimental greeting cards, but most likely will induce the gag reflex in everyone else. As such, the horribly executed, overly manipulative and generally hokey ending nearly derails everything the film was trying to accomplish up to that point.
To make matters worse and despite its title, the film doesn't make good use of the boy/dog relationship. Although a few scenes are focused on the two of them, the pooch is later relegated to minor supporting character status as the story switches gears and focuses more on Nello's various trials and tribulations, few of which involved the dog.
While that's not a cinematic crime in and upon itself, the replacement elements, while somewhat decent in their own episodic way, don't add much to what should have been a highly imaginative piece. Kids may find some of it interesting, but adults will probably view most of the proceedings as trite and the whole "mystery" regarding the identity of Nello's father as an easy and predictable case to crack.
The performances, while lining up on either side of the standard good character, bad character fence found in many stories aimed kids, are decent, although some are better and more believable than others. The best belongs to Jon Voight ("Varsity Blues," "The General") as the caring and understanding artist/instructor who wishes to help Nello. The film's other father figure, played by Jack Warden ("Heaven Can Wait," "Shampoo") is good, but is absent from the picture for long stretches of time and often feels a bit too cliched and American when present.
That's definitely true for the young boys who play Nello at various ages. While Jeremy James Kissner ("Great Expectations") and Jesse James ("Message in a Bottle") deliver decent performances, they feel more like outsiders than inherently credible characters. Although it's possible that was intentionally done (to give them even more of an alienated aura), at times it grates with the rest of the cast and overall production. Nonetheless, they manage to create a likeable enough character to overcome such problems.
The rest of the performances are generally okay, with Cheryl Ladd (TV's "Charlie's Angels," many made for TV movies) and Steven Hartley ("Christopher Columbus: The Discovery") coming off as believable as the stern father and his more accepting wife, while little Madyline Sweeten gets the "cute as a button" award for her portrayal of young Aloise.
Well-intentioned but flawed, the picture isn't horrible by any means, but clearly isn't a great children's film. Although it's a refreshing and welcomed change to see a good lead character with a talent and the drive to perfect it, the film's episodic nature and complete derailing in its overly preachy and exceptionally mawkish third act will make it a tough pill for most adult viewers to swallow. And without capitalizing enough on the boy/dog relationship, the film may similarly disappoint younger viewers. Decent, but destined for a quick trip to the video shelves, we give "A Dog of Flanders" a 4.5 out of 10.