Although he's successfully played a wide range of characters throughout his career, actor Mel Gibson is probably best known for playing the tough hero character who pursues the villains, rights any number of purported wrongs and kills many of those responsible in the process.
Such characters have been cathartic favorites among moviegoers ever since light first made its way through that thin layer of celluloid and onto the silver screen. Whether he's taken care of aristocratic villains ("Braveheart"), any number of bad guys while in the guise of detective Riggs (the "Lethal Weapon" films), or fended off a bunch of post-apocalyptic punks (the "Mad Max/Road Warrior" series), Gibson has perfectly personified the character who "takes out the trash" in an audience pleasing fashion.
In playing such characters, however, Gibson never personifies the perfect hero. Quite the contrary, his characters are occasionally flawed and nearly always have a dark and edgy quality about them, as if they're only a step -- or misstep as it were -- away from becoming a bad guy themselves. That's what makes them -- and Gibson's performances -- so much fun to watch.
Well, now he's purposefully stepped across that line in playing Porter, the "bad guy as the hero" character in his latest film, "Payback." While some have expressed concern for this "risky" career move and others have lauded this "leap," playing such a character certainly isn't much of a risk or, for that matter, a stretch for this talented actor when considering those characters he's previously inhabited.
Nor is having a villain as the central protagonist much of a big deal either, as recently proven in the fun and witty crime film, "Get Shorty" where John Travolta's criminal character was a favorite among audiences. Where this film may have taken a huge misstep, however, is in its overall brutal and sadistic tone. While the promotional pieces for it state, "Get ready to root for the bad guy," they should more properly read, "Get ready to watch Mel get the crap beaten out of him."
Although some of it's obviously meant to be taken in a comic vein, and most of it's flippantly played to some extent, including so much brutal violence is a fine line that a film like this must delicately tread lest it turn off its audience. Here we get to see Mel being shot, punched, beaten and getting several toes smashed with a large mallet, and that doesn't even include the moments when his character callously terminates (not in a shootout, but execution style) even more villainous characters.
Based on the novel "The Hunter," by Richard Stark, and as adapted and directed by Brian Helgeland (who makes his directing debut after penning films such as "L.A. Confidential" and "The Postman") and co-writer Terry Hayes ("Dead Calm"), the film does efficiently deliver the anticipated goods (the "worse" villains getting their comeuppance). As such, it seems to have the requisite amount of cathartic moments for the audience, and many at our screening seemed to get a kick out of what they were seeing.
While it does work on that basic level, the film doesn't have enough lighter moments (such as in the "Lethal Weapon" films), however, to placate those moviegoers who have a less than hearty appetite for such sadistic mayhem. Consequently, it may have a hard time finding a huge audience and may just ensure that Gibson stays over on the "good guy" side of the fence for future roles.
The revenge plot, while dramatically solid -- albeit in an extremely simplified fashion -- also doesn't offer enough in the way of those audience pleasing creative solutions (where the hero twists and shapes the proceedings to best benefit his goal) until the end is drawing near. In addition, many of the characters, including most of the Outfit members and all of the Asian gang are nothing but stereotypes or extremely two-dimensional beings of which we know next to nothing.
That's especially surprising considering Helgeland's masterfully wonderful script for "L.A. Confidential. However, it's not uncommon for former writers-turned-directors to often have problems shouldering the extra responsibilities of helming a feature, and the rumor mill has it that Gibson actually replaced the first-timer and assumed control of the finished product (which may explain the rather sporadic voice over narration that accompanies a few scenes). While one may never know the full or true extent to that story, the film clearly isn't as good as either talent probably wished or expected it to be.
That said, and for what he's trying to accomplish, Gibson is quite good in the role of the antihero. Clearly not one concerned about getting down and dirty (in appearance or behavior), Mel's perfected the scruffy, vengeful character persona and it works well for him in this picture. Despite being a "bad guy" himself -- and somewhat by default considering the rest of the cast -- Gibson easily evokes the audience's enthusiasm for his character to succeed.
The rest of the cast is decent, but can't escape the fact that most of them inhabit stereotypical, throwaway parts that will quickly be forgotten not long after one leaves the theater. Gregg Henry (the killer in Brian de Palma's "Body Double") is the standard criminal who loses his backbone whenever confronted by anyone more dangerous than him, while William Devane (TV's "Knots Landing") simply replays the intense, teeth-baring tough guy character he's perfected over the years. While Lucy Alexis Liu (TV's "Ally McBeal") gives a somewhat amusing take as a pain- loving dominatrix, it's veteran actor James Coburn ("Affliction") who steals the show in a brief appearance.
Although the film will obviously appeal to a certain segment of the moviegoing audience (those who like their mayhem served with a punch in the face and a kick in the groin), and does effectively deliver what's expected of it, the picture may just be too meanspirited and brutal for its own good and/or many moviegoers' tastes. Okay for what it's trying to accomplish, the film is "entertaining" on its own level, but clearly could have used more humor to better temper the wanton violence. We give the film a 5.5 out of 10.